Nextech Blog

Peer-to-Peer Insights on your EMR and Practice Management at EDGE

Demetria Wright on 10/03/2014

Going to a user conference, attendees can predict that they will hear from a multitude of company appointed speakers as well as industry thought leaders. The knowledge gained is valuable and expected for someone looking to get a better understanding of the product they are using. Although this aspect of attending a software user conference is of paramount importance, another component not to be minimalized is the opportunity to get insights from fellow EMR and practice management users to help improve your own usability.

Read More

Topics: Healthcare IT

ICD-10 beyond billing: Readying a practice’s clinical function

Nextech on 10/02/2014

While most discussion of the October 1, 2015, transition to ICD-10 focuses on the billing function, ICD-10’s impact will extend significantly to the clinical side of practices as well. Documentation captured in electronic medical records (EMRs) must give coders information that supports the new coding standard if claims are to be accurate and complete. Fortunately, providers have less learning ahead than coders do. And unlike coders, they don’t have to wait until the transition date to begin actually performing in ICD-10 terms. They can, and should, start soon.

Clinicians who are not yet familiar with the impact of ICD-10 on their function can read a two-page summary titled “Effects on Clinical Documentation” in the CMS ICD-10 Implementation Guide for Small and Medium Practices. In addition, each practice will want to form a game plan for readying clinicians for the effect the transition will have on its particular specialty.

Read More

Topics: Healthcare IT, Compliance

Physician adoption rate for mobile devices

Nextech on 09/24/2014

Physicians increasingly expect the ability to access EMRs on their mobile devices. As we relayed in this space in July, a recent survey found that 100 percent of physician practices that are considering switching EMRs view mobile access as a requirement for their next system.
Read More

Topics: Practice Management, Electronic Medical Records, Patient Engagement, Mobility

How differences between ICD-9 and ICD-10 affect specialty practices

Nextech on 09/19/2014

The differences between ICD-9 and ICD-10 stem from the aims of the newer coding standard. Of particular interest to specialty practices, ICD-10 will much more adequately and accurately describe care and will serve much better for reimbursement purposes, for which ICD-9 was never intended. For ICD-10 to deliver these advantages, it must offer a much larger number of codes. ICD-9’s smaller format restricted its code capacity, which had simply hit its limit.

That’s why ICD-9 is being retired on October 1, 2015, in the transition to ICD-10, which affects coding for patients covered by any health insurance, not just Medicare or Medicaid. Specialty practices with insurance reimbursements need to focus only on ICD-10-CM, which is for all diagnosis coding, and can ignore hospital inpatient coding’s ICD-10-PCS.

Read More

Topics: Compliance

How to make your next EHR better than your last

Demetria Wright on 08/21/2014

As more and more physicians adopt an electronic health record (EHR) system, it would seem that the government’s plan to incentivize EHR use is paying off. The question, though, is for who? According to a recent survey conducted by Medical Economics, more than two thirds of today’s physician-operated practices have implemented an EHR into their daily routine but many of them aren’t so sure of its payoff. With that being said, as the industry works to find a systematic way of documenting and managing healthcare, providers are now making the move to switch systems to find the perfect fit for their style of practice.

Citing pain points such as less-than-desirable functionality and the lack of preparedness for meeting compliance deadlines, the Medical Economics survey says 67 percent of their nearly 1,000 respondents are dissatisfied with their current system, driving their search for a more suitable solution equipped to meet the daily challenges providers face. So, what should physicians look for to make their replacement vendor better than their current? Here are some points to consider before jumping ship:

Read More

Topics: Specialty Solutions, Electronic Medical Records

How a technology partner can help streamline MU Stage 2 attestation

Nextech on 07/30/2014

Meaningful use holds a catch for specialists; some requirements are inapplicable to certain specialties, yet there are no “blanket” exclusions for which any affected practices can qualify. CMS publishes a specialist tipsheet that helps in identifying which exclusions may apply, but specialist practices are completely responsible for evaluating “whether they meet the exclusion criteria for each applicable objective.”

As specialists who participated in meaningful use Stage 1 prepare to advance to Stage 2, there are two important factors to consider regarding the choice of an electronic medical record (EMR) technology partner:

  • The EMR must be ONC-ACB certified for meaningful use Stage 2.
  • The EMR should also ideally be designed specifically to support the practice’s specialty.
Read More

Topics: Specialty Solutions, Electronic Medical Records, Compliance

ICD-10: It’s only as disruptive as your EMR allows

Nextech on 07/21/2014

Most specialty providers have a general sense of the distance between where they stand today with ICD-10, and where they need to be when the ICD-10 transition officially occurs on October 1, 2015. The actual size of that gulf is largely a matter of the electronic medical record (EMR) in use. If the EMR will do all that it can (and should) to automate the transition, the ride to ICD-10 should be pleasantly smooth.

Read More

Topics: Specialty Solutions, Healthcare IT, Compliance

On the move: EMR mobility vital to effective care delivery

Nextech on 07/10/2014

Earlier this year, research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that more than 78 percent of office-based physicians were using an electronic medical record. As physicians become increasingly familiar with EMRs, they are demanding more from their solutions to help them boost productivity. More often than not, they are looking for one main thing: mobility. According to research released by Black Book Rankings in May 2013, of the one-in-five physician practices surveyed that were considering switching their EMR vendor, 100 percent expected any new EMR to allow doctors to access patient data no matter where the care was being delivered.

Read More

Improved efficiency: Customizing the EMR to fit each doctor’s needs

Nextech on 07/08/2014

No two doctors are alike. So it goes without saying that each doctor’s method for collecting and documenting each patient’s visit is equally varied. That’s why it’s important for practices to choose an EMR system that easily allows all doctors in the practice to customize EMR templates to match his or her unique workflow.

But not all EMRs that promise do-it-yourself customization are created equal. Most EMR vendors will provide templates geared toward a range of medical specialties, and these are a good place to start. However, having the ability to mold that template into a doctor- and treatment-specific document that can both capture the relevant clinical information and interface seamlessly with the practice management system is key. For instance, in an orthopedic practice, one doctor may specialize in sports injuries, so their customized template will be geared toward ligament strains and tears. This won’t come close to resembling that of another doctor in the same practice whose focus is on joint reconstruction and replacement, which will have a field for recording information about osteoarthritis. Yet, since each doctor has created their own template to capture exactly the information they need, the same EMR allows them to work at high efficiency with little or no disruption to their patient visit.

Read More

Topics: Specialty Solutions, Healthcare IT

Portals Key to Patient Engagement

Nextech on 06/19/2014

Among all the focus on developing new technologies to aid healthcare providers, most clinicians will tell you the same thing: Healthcare still comes down to patient care and the patient experience. And the folks at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) believe that too, as evidenced by a significant update in the Meaningful Use Stage 1 requirements for 2014, which now include a core objective “to provide patients with ability to view online, download, and transmit health information for all providers.” That’s another way of saying providers now need to provide a patient portal in order to meet Stage 1.

Instead of seeing this as yet another burdensome requirement that needs to be met, healthcare organizations should consider it an opportunity to improve communication with their patients. Further, Meaningful Use Stage 2 already has a significant patient engagement element requiring that providers show at least 5 percent of patients are using patient portals to view, download and transmit their health information as well as send secure electronic messages to their provider. While 5 percent may not seem like a lot, those providers who are now pursuing Stage 2 are significantly concerned about reaching those levels of engagement, so having a functional portal required earlier should make it easier to hit the minimum participation rate down the road.

Read More

Topics: Practice Management, Compliance, Patient Engagement